Protesting Disillusionment

December 1, 2011

Concepcion Picciotto is the original occupier. An anti-nuclear advocate, Concepcion set up a “peace vigil” in front of the White House on Jan. 1, 1981. Since then, her powerful neighbor changed five times. But Concepcion and her bright yellow signs have occupied that same stretch of sidewalk 24/7, 365 days a year, for three decades – minus occasional bathroom breaks.

When I walked along Pennsylvania Avenue on my way to work last spring, I was more captivated by the big white landmark Concepcion faced than her makeshift white plastic tent. I dismissed her encampment as quickly as I did the graphic anti-choice abortion trucks that cruise D.C., without the annoyed disgust.

But they weren’t the only protesters I chose to ignore during my seven months in Washington. In April, 5,000 young people rallied in front of the White House to call for green energy investments. I support that, but I didn’t see a reason to tuck my White House Intern badge into my blazer and join the demonstrators. My major is government, not activism. Like many of us in Claremont, I wanted to be an “insider.” In a few years, I could get a job on the Energy and Commerce Committee and help write climate change legislation. Why protest?

I may read Politico’s Playbook religiously, but I’m no more of a political insider than I was a doctor when four-year-old me used a plastic stethoscope to diagnose Beanie Babies. Yet I analyzed the environmental protest. The President agreed with the group’s intentions. But – as Gov. 20 drilled into my brain – governing is tough. Congress couldn’t even pass climate change legislation when Democrats controlled both chambers.

Young people are supposedly disappointed in President Obama and disillusioned with politics. Instead, I was disillusioned with protesting.

My disillusionment followed me back to Claremont, where my inside-the-system attitude fit in at CMC. But when I went to Pitzer for Occupy Claremont, I felt out of place. I arrived during an announcement about a Keystone XL pipeline action. I’d heard about the pipeline, which would transport crude oil from Canada, and knew environmentalists were against it. To avoid possibly disagreeing with what I hoped would be a thoroughly vetted decision by the Obama administration, – the “inside game” I wanted to play – I avoided the issue.

The Claremont anti-pipeline protest wasn’t that impressive, anyway. About thirty students took their picture with a sign and sent it to Obama. But their voices weren’t alone. On Nov. 6, 12,000 activists circled the White House and demanded the President stop the pipeline. Four days later, Obama announced the decision would be delayed until 2013. For now, the protest worked.

Immediately, guilt set in. I’d been too quick to side with the insiders. I’d forgotten why I was so enchanted with the Obama campaign in 2008: it empowered ordinary people to become leaders, both to elect a candidate and to fight for issues they believed in. The pipeline protesters demonstrated how organized activism could influence the system. As Obama reminded progressives a year into his presidency, “Keep holding me accountable.”

A certain level of disillusionment is necessary to work in politics – otherwise your ideals are crushed during your first internship. But, fellow wannabe insiders: don’t be disillusioned with activism. I may be skeptical about the un-organized organization of Occupy – I wish they’d rally behind the American Jobs Act – but the movement should be taken seriously. I won’t join Concepcion’s peace vigil, nor will I protest Condoleezza Rice’s Ath talk. But when an issue I’m passionate about comes up, I’ll organize. For now, I’m protesting disillusionment.

Alyssa Roberts, Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of the Claremont Port Side, is a senior Government major at Claremont McKenna. She's from Denver, Colorado and obsessively follows Colorado politics. Her role models include Elle Woods and David Plouffe, and D.C. is her Hollywood. She carries an autographed pocket Constitution (her favorite amendment is the 14th). Other interests include coffee, fro-yo, and Hairspray. Tweet her @alyssaaroberts.


2 Responses to “Protesting Disillusionment”

  1. A local citizen says:

    The problem with being a ‘progressive college student’ is the knee jerk reaction to liberal causes you are ‘supposed’ to have.

    The problem with any issue of national import is like your reaction to ‘Keystone,’ you were against it without knowing anything about it . . . how is that either informed, intelligent or progressive? It is a knee-jerk reaction you have been programmed to have – ‘environmentalists are against it so I am against it.”

    Why?

    Like Republicans are accused of, ‘environmentalists’ are against literally everything. They should be against the Prius, because it ultimately causes more CO2 emissions than a regular car because of the cost of making, transporting and disposing of the batteries, much less what the environmental impact is going to be when it is time to finally safely dispose of all that lithium. But they are not against the Prius because they simply DO NOT THINK –

    Before we move on to the Volt. . . . let me ask your progressive soul a question: “How much good would a billion dollars do the poor in this country?’

    That’s the subsidy for the 40,000 Volt’s sold -
    http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/govt-subsidies-for-chevy-volt-up-to-250000-per-car/

    What a waste . . .and before we move on to the ‘environmental’ benefits of it – well, lets do that now . . . .
    Electricity is only 33% efficient, meaning that of the BTU potential in the fuel used to create electricity, only 1/3 of the potential is realized as voltage oout of the wall.
    Consumer Reports noted that the Volt is only 85% efficient = it can only use 85% of comes oout of the socket – so for that 35 miles of electric driving, you need 41 miles of electricity put into the battery.
    The batteries are constructed in factories in South Korea and then put on a ship and transported here – where they go on a train and then a truck to the factory in Michigan, while $300 million of borrowed money is being used from stimulus funds either printed by the Fed and ‘loaned’ to the government or from China – how much sense does that make now?

    I’ll support your right to believe anything you want to believe , once you have the facts about what you believe . . . .but how you arrive at your belief system, through some knee jerk reaction to an issue because you are supposed to believe a certain way is not respectful of your education or intellect as evidenced by your attending these colleges in Claremont.

    Issues such as the Keystone Pipeline are complex and not merely environmental – if the US through any combination of offshore or local access to energy was able to become self-sufficient in petroleum products the political implications for foreign policy and the implementation of various policies by GOVERNMENT, your major, are profound. To dismiss any effort because of environmental concerns is silly and short-sighted and simply pandering to a constituency that Obama needs to get elected.

  2. Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to safeguard against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any recommendations? louis vuitton bags replica http://cheaplouisvuittonbagsreplica.webs.com/


Leave a Reply

Published with support from Campus Progress. CampusProgress.org

Copyright © 2013 Claremont Port Side.